FIDIC 2017 Editions and Claims

While you may have not had the opportunity to examine the 2017 editions of the FIDIC contracts, because you have not yet come across any projects that are using them, this situation will gradually change. Before too long, we will need to know what has changed and how it has changed. Therefore, I thought that it would be worthwhile to highlight the changes from a claims point of view. Sub-Clause 2.5 (Employer’s Claims) has been deleted in the 2017 editions and Employer’s claims are now dealt with together with Contractor’s claims under Sub-Clauses 20.1 (Claims) and 20.2 (Claims For Payment and/or EOT). The Employer is now obliged to give notice of claim no later than 28 days after the event or circumstances giving rise to the claim. This has now become a condition precedent to entitlement for both Parties. If the Engineer considers that a notice of claim was not given within the stipulated 28 days, he/she is obliged to give a notice of such within 14 days of receipt of the notice of…

Read More


The Golden Principles of FIDIC

We have all been presented with what appears to be a FIDIC form of contract, but when we study its contents or the Particular Conditions, we notice that it has been modified considerably: Clauses affecting the Contractor’s rights and remedies have been removed. Other clauses which are often punitive toward the Contractor have been added. The re-measurable Red Book has somehow become a lump-sum contract. Time frames have been altered - reduced for the Contractor and extended (or omitted entirely) for the Engineer and Employer. Changes and amendments are often poorly drafted and the final version contains ambiguities and conflicts. What we end up with no longer meets FIDIC’s stated purpose of ‘allocating risks fairly to the party that is best able to bear and control that risk’. Obviously, these changes are an attempt to minimise the Employer’s and Engineer’s responsibility and transfer risk onto the Contractor in the mistaken belief that this will bring about a lower contract price…

Read More


Q&A: Entitlements Under the FIDIC White Book

The following questions, related to contractual issues arising from COVID-19, were posed during our fifteenth Construction Clinic, held in July 2020. Andy Hewitt's responses have been summarised from the original. The entire webinar may be viewed on-demand on YouTube. Question 1 Question: (Part 1 of 3) This question is in several parts. It is related to the FIDIC consultancy contract, which is the White Book, in terms of management of a consultant on his project. The first part of the question asks what is allowable and what is not. [Note: this blog post on the Practical Law Construction Blog has more information on the White Book.] Answer: The White Book is not one of the contracts that I deal with on a regular basis, so I had a quick look at it. There's absolutely no definition of cost in the White Book. So, if it concerns a variation to the consultant’s services, redesigning something, designing variations, possibly being deployed on an extended period because the Contractor didn't…

Read More


Q&A: Delays, Variations, and Revised Programmes

The following questions were answered by Steering Committee member, Lee Sporle during Construction Clinic 11, recorded on 9 June 2020. The responses have been summarized from the original. The entire webinar may be viewed on-demand on YouTube. Question 1 Question: We have a project timeline from January 2020 to July 2020. By March 2020, the project was running behind schedule by 60 days and we had an extension for 30 days. Our revised programme was submitted with a cut-off date in March 2020 and the new completion date set to August 2020 instead of July 2020, and the Contractor recovered his 30 days delay. We have another claim event started just after the data date of March 2020. Which version of programme update do we use to analyse the delay using the TIA method: the revised programme, which the Contractor has delayed due to the recovery made, or the normal update on the baseline programme, the revised programme, which shows the real Contractor delay at this time? Answer: OK. So,…

Read More


Q&A: Prolongation Thickening Claims

In this blog post, ICCP President, Paul Gibbons, examines thickening of preliminaries. This blog post is an excerpt of a question answered in our eleventh Construction Clinic session, which took place in June 2020. The entire webinar may be viewed on-demand on YouTube. Question 1 Question: What is the meaning of thickening in a typical prolongation claim and how should it be claimed for? Answer: The calculation of thickening deals with the impact of additional resources, plant and overhead which the Contractor or Sub-Contractor might be entitled to. Assessing thickening claims requires an understanding of the “planned” resources, plant, overhead and comparing this to the “actual” resources, plant and overhead. This would result in a planned versus actual histogram. It is best to keep the resource discipline separate so that it can be easily presented and assessed. In simple terms, the ‘thickening’ is where you have more actual resources than that which you had planned to have. This…

Read More